Reviews by doudouce55

Nothing really wild about this film about redemption and accepting to live with your past. Decent movie. Good stuff. (The book was way much better imho.)

Not much of a musical fan. That said, it's a decent watch, with decent special effects. Streep was superbly cast. Decent adaptation from stage to screen.

A decent adaptation of Grangé's book (remember him? his first novel adapted to the screen was Crimson Rivers). Confusing yet engaging at times, it is still a decent watch with a complex story.

This movie looked quite promising, but in the end turns out to be very disappointing. Too many flaws in the story for it to be even remotely believable. Acting performances are decent though, although at times Watts overacts (IMHO).

A little slow at times, but worth watching. Learned much about this man, the situation and the world of wrestling. Be patient as you watch, as it took us a good 90 minutes (out of the 120 minutes of the film) to finally "get into it". If you last that long, everything will make sense, it is be a decent watch. Decent acting performances by Carell, Ruffalo and Tatum.

Can you say "predictable" or "box office flop" any faster? This was horrendous to watch. Avoid. Two hours of my life I won't get back.

Actually quite surprised at this. Excellent entertainment. Few parts in script didn't make sense, but after a 2nd viewing, the beginning made more sense :) Decent acting performances. Worth watching.

Always nice to fall back to our kiddie selves ;) while watching silly animations. This is not as good as the first. Still a good watch.

Totally insignificant/dull performances by Roth and Kidman. However I went into it not knowing much about Kelly, Rainier or Monaco, so it was an interesting watch nonetheless - if there's any truth to the story at all.

Visually stunning, and worth watching only for that. Quite poor acting performances. Why is it I always feel a movie's a comedy when watching French actors perform? Such theatrical acts.